1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:01,890 [Treehouse Teacher Q & A] 2 00:00:01,890 --> 00:00:05,820 Do you think designing a website in Photoshop has now become a waste of time? 3 00:00:05,820 --> 00:00:08,440 Should we start designing directly in the browser? 4 00:00:11,020 --> 00:00:14,970 Now, I was actually thinking about this because a lot of times you want to present 5 00:00:14,970 --> 00:00:19,700 a markup to a client and you can do that in an App like balsamic markups 6 00:00:19,700 --> 00:00:25,520 where you actually have the squiggly lines that tell the person that's looking at it-- 7 00:00:25,520 --> 00:00:29,130 this is just a markup, it's not actually something that's real. 8 00:00:30,450 --> 00:00:33,800 But the squiggly lines that they have in balsamic markups are important-- 9 00:00:33,800 --> 00:00:36,100 they communicate that it is a markup. 10 00:00:36,100 --> 00:00:41,540 I thought it might be cool to actually put together like a small little CSS file 11 00:00:41,540 --> 00:00:49,150 or CSS markup framework basically that would allow you to throw down 12 00:00:49,150 --> 00:00:55,150 a border image or something like that, that actually has those squiggly lines in it 13 00:00:55,150 --> 00:01:02,170 and then you can design in the browser with the idea in mind 14 00:01:02,170 --> 00:01:04,340 that it is just going to be a markup. 15 00:01:04,340 --> 00:01:08,820 It's always risky showing client something that you've been working on 16 00:01:08,820 --> 00:01:11,390 and not necessarily something that's completely done. 17 00:01:11,390 --> 00:01:16,420 Right. >>Because they want to make those changes like extreme 18 00:01:16,420 --> 00:01:22,120 and it's not necessarily representational of like your best work. 19 00:01:22,120 --> 00:01:27,660 So, that's why I like wireframing stuff up beforehand. 20 00:01:27,660 --> 00:01:28,450 [Question: Should we design in Photoshop or in the browser?] 21 00:01:28,450 --> 00:01:30,860 [Treehouse Teacher Q & A]