1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:01,890
[Treehouse Teacher Q & A]

2
00:00:01,890 --> 00:00:05,820
Do you think designing a website in Photoshop has now become a waste of time?

3
00:00:05,820 --> 00:00:08,440
Should we start designing directly in the browser?

4
00:00:11,020 --> 00:00:14,970
Now, I was actually thinking about this because a lot of times you want to present

5
00:00:14,970 --> 00:00:19,700
a markup to a client and you can do that in an App like balsamic markups

6
00:00:19,700 --> 00:00:25,520
where you actually have the squiggly lines that tell the person that's looking at it--

7
00:00:25,520 --> 00:00:29,130
this is just a markup, it's not actually something that's real.

8
00:00:30,450 --> 00:00:33,800
But the squiggly lines that they have in balsamic markups are important-- 

9
00:00:33,800 --> 00:00:36,100
they communicate that it is a markup.

10
00:00:36,100 --> 00:00:41,540
I thought it might be cool to actually put together like a small little CSS file

11
00:00:41,540 --> 00:00:49,150
or CSS markup framework basically that would allow you to throw down

12
00:00:49,150 --> 00:00:55,150
a border image or something like that, that actually has those squiggly lines in it

13
00:00:55,150 --> 00:01:02,170
and then you can design in the browser with the idea in mind

14
00:01:02,170 --> 00:01:04,340
that it is just going to be a markup.

15
00:01:04,340 --> 00:01:08,820
It's always risky showing client something that you've been working on

16
00:01:08,820 --> 00:01:11,390
and not necessarily something that's completely done.

17
00:01:11,390 --> 00:01:16,420
Right. >>Because they want to make those changes like extreme

18
00:01:16,420 --> 00:01:22,120
and it's not necessarily representational of like your best work.

19
00:01:22,120 --> 00:01:27,660
So, that's why I like wireframing stuff up beforehand.

20
00:01:27,660 --> 00:01:28,450
[Question: Should we design in Photoshop or in the browser?]

21
00:01:28,450 --> 00:01:30,860
[Treehouse Teacher Q & A]