Welcome to the Treehouse Community
Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.
Looking to learn something new?
Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.
Start your free trial
LORENA DI ROCCO
2,105 PointsWondering why we don't need to add a <ul> tags to include the social icons in the footer?
Up until this point I figured we need to use these tags whenever we include a "list" of items, such as the navigation and gallery. So why not now. Is it because we won't need to style these therefore, there's no need to wrap them inside the unordered list tag? #confused #newtothis
1 Answer
Rob Rees
6,076 PointsThey can still be styled irrespective of being in <ul> tags. Its probably just a personal preference not to use <ul> there.
Richard Duncan
5,568 PointsRichard Duncan
5,568 PointsCan you post the markup LORENA DI ROCCO ? it's not good semantic HTML to omit the <ul> tag so I'm guessing something else is going on here.