Welcome to the Treehouse Community
Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.
Looking to learn something new?
Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.
Start your free trialMonq Wellington
21,685 PointsA pedagogical suggestion
I don't know much about design in general. All the information in the CSS Foundations course is new information to me. I think it may be beneficial to others in similar situations as to move the Box Model session to being after the Selectors session, and before the Advanved Selectors session to break up the flow of having to learn so many selectors all at once, as well as start to introduce a "bigger picture" concept of the CSS ideal. All apologies if this is a repeated topic that's been posted already. Otherwise, keep up the good work.
-cheers
1 Answer
Jason Broderick
7,361 PointsIf you take a step back from this as a subject and think about learning as a whole it is better I feel to follow the learning model of FOCUS - Follow One Course Until Success. Jumping from topic to topic inside a subject isn't a particularly good idea I feel as it breaks your focus. In this instance, at the stage of learning you were at the Box Model is a big shift in gears and a really high level concept that deserves to be separated like it is. If you learn about basic selectors then have to completely switch gears then it would be even more difficult to learn about advanced selectors afterwards. While you are in the frame of mind to think about selectors that's the best time to continue.
Keep ploughing on! Once you've done the whole CSS and HTML Foundations and Deep Dives the whole world opens up!
Monq Wellington
21,685 PointsHey Jason. I wasn't suggesting anything to the contrary of an "unFOCUS-ed" approach. More along the lines of talking about teaching styles. e.g. If you were learning about cars, is it better to see the whole car first before you break it into it's parts? Or is it better to learn the vocabulary of the parts before putting it together as a whole? Like how general ed teaches mathematics in public schools, they don't really start talking about the bigger picture until you get to calculus. But you can't get to calculus until you know all the details of trig, algebra, etc. I personally enjoy the "top down" or "bigger picture" approach to things because I know what the picture looks like as I put my puzzle together. But of course, it's a pedantic decision of how the teacher wants, & thinks is the most effective way, to teach. I take it on good faith that treehouse has gold at the end of this rainbow that I'm following, otherwise I wouldn't have joined this community. Thanks for your encouragement though, Jason. Cheers.
James Barnett
39,199 Pointsit's a pedantic decision of how the teacher wants, & thinks is the most effective way
On the topic of pedantic points, in this case I think it's actually more of a pedagogical decision
Monq Wellington
21,685 Pointsyou're right, pedantic isn't the appropriate choice word. i meant no offense if anyone thought i was trying.
James Barnett
39,199 PointsJames Barnett
39,199 PointsTagging Guil Hernandez on this