Welcome to the Treehouse Community

The Treehouse Community is a meeting place for developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels to get support. Collaborate here on code errors or bugs that you need feedback on, or asking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project. Join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today. (Note: Only Treehouse students can comment or ask questions, but non-students are welcome to browse our conversations.)

Looking to learn something new?

Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and a supportive community. Start your free trial today.

JavaScript JavaScript and the DOM (Retiring) Responding to User Interaction Delaying Execution with setTimeout()

Richard Hriech
Richard Hriech
12,001 Points

Am I the only one who thinks anonymous functions are harder to read? I usually try to avoid using them.

Sure you type less, but looking at exec(say, "Hi there!"); seems much easier to understand at first glance than exec((something)=>console.log(something), "Hi there!"); even though you have to look for what "say" does elsewhere.

1 Answer

jsdevtom
jsdevtom
16,963 Points

It is a matter of preference. I personally use named function references when things start to look ugly. There are also other benefits to using named functions including easier debugging and being able to refer to itself. The opensource 'You don't know JavaScript' series has a great chapter on this here.