Welcome to the Treehouse Community

Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.

Looking to learn something new?

Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.

Start your free trial

CSS CSS Foundations CSS Gradients Repeating Gradients

Gina Bégin
PLUS
Gina Bégin
Courses Plus Student 8,613 Points

Are gradients really common enough to spend this much time on?

Just wondering if I'm missing something... this seems like a ton of time to spend on something I rarely see in modern sites, but maybe there are applications that aren't as apparent?

8 Answers

Bradley Lawson
Bradley Lawson
3,068 Points

So glad I'm not the only one feeling like this is a complete waste of time...

I came to the comments on this video specifically looking for this kind of thread.

I feel better now :)

Edit As a designer, the part at the end on Colorzilla made me breathe a sigh of relief!

Shawn Denham
seal-mask
PLUS
.a{fill-rule:evenodd;}techdegree
Shawn Denham
Python Development Techdegree Student 17,802 Points

Ah Design philosophy! Gradients were all the rage before flat design became mainstream. Just look at older OSX desktops compared to the new flat design of Yosemite.

Same is probably true of Windows as well, though I think they are still using a lot of gradients in the Windows 8 color palette.

I know these are not website but as the web trend goes so goes the desktop.

If history really does repeat itself we should be back to shiny gradient filled button in a few years! >.<

Gina Bégin
Gina Bégin
Courses Plus Student 8,613 Points

So this might just be a case of a video that's a bit out of fashion? ;)

Joe Rizza
Joe Rizza
8,513 Points

I agree, spending 9 minutes plus a quiz on repeating gradients alone is just unnecessary!

Gina Bégin
Gina Bégin
Courses Plus Student 8,613 Points

By the time you are done with the 6th video and 6th quiz, you're ready to forget CSS. In fact, I probably did forget a lot of what I learned, just from trying to remember gradients well enough to pass the quizzes and make it to the next section of the course.

Corey Simons
Corey Simons
2,222 Points

Agree, this video is painful.

The only info from this entire gradient section I have found useful is the transparent 'white' trick used on the full width gradient overlay and the use of position stops in general. Way too much detail on everything else.

Daniel Politz
Daniel Politz
6,338 Points

Appreciate the heads up on this. Was wondering the same question about application and how often I would use this skill. Definitely a technical overload for a skill that may rarely be used.

James Page
James Page
9,621 Points

A +1 on the 'me, too!' sentiments about the repeating gradient video.

Whilst it might be an interesting trick for some, the value of knowing how or when to use repeating gradients hasn't been explained. The last time I saw anything like the repeating gradients used in the video was around 1997 and tessellating tiled background images were all the rage.

Gina Bégin
PLUS
Gina Bégin
Courses Plus Student 8,613 Points

So is there any way to alert the Treehouse team about the video maybe being out of date or not so useful? Or at least to have them update it so we understand WHY we are having to go through that section and learn all of that?

James Page
James Page
9,621 Points

There may be a few ways, Gina. First, there's the feedback mechanism for each video via its page (I think it's at the end of each video or section, IIRC). Second, there's help@teamtreehouse.com - which might be the best way to get a response. And third, there's Guil Hernandez himself on Twitter - @GuilH. As I was typing his name with an '@' symbol before it, I noticed it offered a list of members. I wonder if this'll tag him into the discussion?