Welcome to the Treehouse Community

Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.

Looking to learn something new?

Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.

Start your free trial

CSS

Can you make a gradient fade into transparency?

I have the following code for making an image at the top of the page fade into another color:

background: linear-gradient(0deg, #F3FAB6, transparent), #444 url('../img/main_badger.jpg') no-repeat center;

I also have a repeating background image which covers my entire <html> web page, is there any way to make an image fade into the web page's background, instead of a simple color?

Thanks in advance!

1 Answer

Sure! The gradient you defined above works fine for me.

Here's a codepen using your rule:

http://codepen.io/anon/pen/rVJKax?editors=110


Edit: Ah! I see. Unfortunately, there's not a good way to do this, but we can hack it: You can do this using masks, but not with a background property. Instead, we stick an image in the html, set position: absolute, and use z-index to move it behind your content.

New codepen:

http://codepen.io/anon/pen/zGWzbm?editors=110

Sorry I think I'm just wording my question badly.

That code works fine but say I am trying to make the gradent turn the image itself see through. So that I can see the repeating background image through the object.

Here is a codepen for example:

http://codepen.io/anon/pen/WvMLgY?editors=110

The gradient fades out but you can clearly see where the div object stops and the repeating background starts. I am trying to make the gradient fade out so that you can see the background behind it.

Thanks

Hey Keith - I updated my answer above.