Welcome to the Treehouse Community

The Treehouse Community is a meeting place for developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels to get support. Collaborate here on code errors or bugs that you need feedback on, or asking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project. Join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today. (Note: Only Treehouse students can comment or ask questions, but non-students are welcome to browse our conversations.)

Looking to learn something new?

Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and a supportive community. Start your free trial today.


.casefold() vs. .lower()

I think the method .casefold() was not yet introduced, but I saw it when Craig introduced string methods with "help(str)." It seems like .casefold() allows caseless comparisons by more aggressively changing characters to the lowercase than .lower() does. That is, suppose you have smpl_str = "der Fluß". Then smpl_str.lower() == "der fluß", meaning that the character "ß" is still upper case. In contrast, smpl_str.casefold() == "der fluss", which has all characters in lower case.

What are the pros and cons of using .casefold() versus using .lower()? I understand that people generally use .casefold() when characters other than Latin or Greek characters are expected, but .lower() when expected characters are restricted to Latin or Greek characters.

However, I haven't found a satisfactory answer as to WHY that is. In other words, why not use .casefold() all the time since we should, as Craig says, "expect the unexpected"? Is there any reason to use .lower() rather than .casefold? E.g., is it much faster/efficient?

1 Answer

Steven Parker
Steven Parker
221,293 Points

Two reasons I can think of to use "lower":

  1. If you're not using non-English characters there's no advantage to "casefold"
  2. The "lower" method has a better chance of working on legacy platforms

I see. Thanks!