Welcome to the Treehouse Community
The Treehouse Community is a meeting place for developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels to get support. Collaborate here on code errors or bugs that you need feedback on, or asking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project. Join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today. (Note: Only Treehouse students can comment or ask questions, but non-students are welcome to browse our conversations.)
Looking to learn something new?
Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and a supportive community. Start your free trial today.

Kenneth Dubroff
10,612 PointsCompiles, and works exactly as expected in Swift
Once again, I'm entering code that satisfies all challenge requirements, compiles in the treehouse compiler, compiles in Xcode, returns the expected values in Xcode, but does not pass the challenge. What am I missing here?
// Enter your code below
func coordinates(location: String) -> (Double, Double) {
switch location {
case "Eiffel Tower": return (48.8582, 2.2945)
case "Great Pyramid": return (29.9792, 31.1344)
case "Sydney Opera House": return (33.8587, 151.2140)
default: return (0,0)
}
}
3 Answers

Jeff McDivitt
23,970 PointsYou are missing the external name that the question specifies "with an external name for"
func coordinates(for location: String) -> (Double, Double){
switch location {
case "Eiffel Tower":
return(48.8582, 2.2945)
case "Great Pyramid":
return(29.9792, 31.1344)
case"Sydney Opera House":
return(33.8587, 151.2140)
default:
return(0,0)
}
}
coordinates(for: "Eiffel Tower")

Kenneth Dubroff
10,612 PointsThanks very much, using the keyword 'for' as a name threw me... I thought it might be a typo. I tried using it in my statement initially but had a syntax error elsewhere. I thought using a keyword for a name would cause a compiler error. Definitely doesn't seem like best practice to me...

Jeff McDivitt
23,970 PointsI had the same question from another person but using the for is not a problem