## Welcome to the Treehouse Community

Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community!

### Looking to learn something new?

Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.

# help me to solve this fizz buzz problem???

please solve this fizz buzz problem??

fizzBuzz.swift
```func fizzBuzz(n: Int) -> String {
// Enter your code between the two comment markers

// End code
return "\(n)"
}
```

Hi Sonu, sorry for answering your question so late. Your snippet is right, but it's not the whole challenge. You have to write the FizzBuzz Code from the challenger before and change your print statements to return statements. If you want I can write the correct answer here, but I think that it's better for you to give it another try first.

Keep on learning,

Moritz

Dear Mortiz, Hear is complete question.

Enter your FizzBuzz solution here! You will have to make some minor changes to get this to work with our editor though. β¨Step 1: Copy-paste your code in between the comments shown below. Your solution is going inside a function I created. Don't worry about what it does, this just allows me to verify your solution. β¨Step 2: Change your variable/constant name that you are checking in each step to n. For example if (n % 3 == 0). You also don't need to define n. It is defined in the function provided. β¨Step 3: Change all your print statements to return statements. For example: print("FizzBuzz") becomes return "FizzBuzz". β¨While these are very specific directions, they allow me to verify your solution precisely over a large number of possible answers.

Note: Do not worry about the default case (where the number doesn't match Fizz, Buzz, or FizzBuzz). The code in the challenge editor already takes care of that by returning the number as a string using string interpolation.

The challenge also does not need you to loop over a range of values (using for or while). I'll take care of that.