Welcome to the Treehouse Community

Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.

Looking to learn something new?

Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.

Start your free trial

CSS

How does one create diamond-shaped photos in CSS?

I understand border radius, but is there a property or value to diamond-shape them?

It's not super simple but there's a trick at this link where you use a pseudo element to fill out the shape.

http://css-tricks.com/examples/ShapesOfCSS/

I haven't done it but if I were you I would take that tip and either apply it directly to your image (with overflow: hidden; or use your image as the background.)

Hi Michael, do you mean a diamond or a losange shape?

6 Answers

Michael Hess Timothy Hooker

I stumbled upon Gaurav Singh's codepen also. Having tinkered with it it does seem stable to me and I would personally re-use - example here.

HTML

<div class="losange">
      <div class="los1">
        <img src="http://photos-d.ak.instagram.com/hphotos-ak-xpa1/10483342_1471091656483347_532843009_n.jpg" />
      </div>
    </div>  

CSS

.losange, .losange div {
  margin: 0 auto;
  transform-origin: 50% 50%;
  overflow: hidden;
  width: 250px;
  height: 250px;
}

.losange {
  transform: rotate(45deg) translateY(10px);
}

.losange .los1 {
  width: 355px;
  height: 355px;
  transform: rotate(-45deg) translateY(-74px);
}

.losange .los1 img {
  width: 100%;
  height: auto;
}

Thanks!

I've created them for mockups in Photoshop, but I was just wondering if there was a CSS method.

Richard, I'm using a diamond for a current site I'm working on, but a lozenge shape wouldn't be bad to know in the future as well!

Oh, sweet action! Thanks, Richard!