## Welcome to the Treehouse Community

Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.

### Looking to learn something new?

Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.

# How is this even wrong. This is what i did first try. Checked the video and it was exactly the same?

really confused!

fizzBuzz.swift
```func fizzBuzz(n: Int) -> String {
// Enter your code between the two comment markers
for n in 1..100 {
if (n % 3 == 0) && (n % 5 == 0) {
return("fizzBuzz")
} else if (n % 3 == 0) {
return("Fizz")
} else if (n % 5 == 0) {
return("Buzz")
} else {
return(n) }
return "\(n)"
} }
```

Hello Benjamin:

Reading the instructions is very important. The challenge says you don't need to do a loop, it also tells you not to worry about the else clause. You were very close to doing it, and you did the "logic" of it.

Here is a solution:

```func fizzBuzz(n: Int) -> String {
// Enter your code between the two comment markers
if n % 3 == 0 && n % 5 == 0{
return "FizzBuzz"
} else if n % 3 == 0 {
return "Fizz"
} else if n % 5 == 0 {
return "Buzz"
}
return "\(n)"
}
```

As you can see, it has the return it had already provided, and there is no loop nor else clause.

Good luck on your next challenge, and congratulations on this one.. This can be a difficult one to understand.

Hey Jhoan, i appreciate your help! I did notice him saying it in the video, but i tried it without a loop either and it didnt work. But yea, i see that it already provided with the return. Thanks so much!

Perhaps it was not passing because you also had "fizzBuzz" instead of "FizzBuzz".