Welcome to the Treehouse Community
Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.
Looking to learn something new?
Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.
Start your free trialRyan Hemrick
12,759 PointsIs it common to omit content in small browser windows (mobile devices)?
Just curious about common practices in user interface design. I notice that in both the Bootstrap and Foundation projects there is a lot of content that is omitted in smaller devices.
Is it better practice to make the user interface on smaller devices less-content-filled (with only the essentials) or is it better practice to completely shift around and manipulate the content to work on smaller devices with media queries?
I'm sure it depends on the client's needs. Just curious as to what a good rule of thumb would be.
Thanks!
2 Answers
Wayne Priestley
19,579 PointsHi Ryan,
As you say, it depends on what the client needs/wants really.
I prefer to have a more basic looking website on a small mobile device, but for a device such as an iPad i like to include almost everything thats on the main site, even if i have to change the layout a little.
Hope this helps.
Allison Walker
17,137 PointsActually, I've been thinking about this a lot. I think we're learning it just for the sake of knowing it's there. Sometimes you might want to remove something. I think that clients who've spent a lot of money on the project would want a good reason before they'd be OK with hiding certain elements, particularly large images of their new product at the top of the page. Then again many clients may not really have much interest in the mobile version of their site, which is a shame.
Another option would be to use a different image set on small screens, so that big complex images that work for desktop/large screens, would be hidden for small screen, and vice-versa.