Welcome to the Treehouse Community
The Treehouse Community is a meeting place for developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels to get support. Collaborate here on code errors or bugs that you need feedback on, or asking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project. Join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today. (Note: Only Treehouse students can comment or ask questions, but non-students are welcome to browse our conversations.)
Looking to learn something new?
Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and a supportive community. Start your free trial today.
Is it wrong to keep the named function on the roll method?
I know this seems unnecessary and makes the code longer, but asking this question to completely understand. The roll method still works if we keep the named function of rollDice. It can literally be named anything and it will still work. We can name it blablabla() if we wanted to and it will work.
Are there ever any scenarios where developers would use a named function for this kind of example, for the simple reason of being more explicit?
Steven Parker218,583 Points
It would be rather unusual, but name might be used if the method was called from code in other methods of the same object. Otherwise all access to the method would be by the property name so a separate function name would be superfluous.