Welcome to the Treehouse Community

Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.

Looking to learn something new?

Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.

Start your free trial

JavaScript Object-Oriented JavaScript (2015) Introduction to Methods Adding a Method to an Object

Posted by jlampstack
jlampstack
23,932 Points

Is it wrong to keep the named function on the roll method?

I know this seems unnecessary and makes the code longer, but asking this question to completely understand. The roll method still works if we keep the named function of rollDice. It can literally be named anything and it will still work. We can name it blablabla() if we wanted to and it will work.

Are there ever any scenarios where developers would use a named function for this kind of example, for the simple reason of being more explicit?

1 Answer

Steven Parker
Steven Parker
230,274 Points
Steven Parker
Steven Parker
230,274 Points

It would be rather unusual, but name might be used if the method was called from code in other methods of the same object. Otherwise all access to the method would be by the property name so a separate function name would be superfluous.