Welcome to the Treehouse Community
Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.
Looking to learn something new?
Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.
Start your free trial![](https://ecs-static.teamtreehouse.com/assets/views/marketing/shared/community-banner-white-47072046c51352fe6a69f5e691ff5700b28bb11d45197d7bdf066d9ea3f72d0c.webp)
![Bjørn Jakobsen](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/452e1b8d64f59a073a2e44d85116439a?s=96&d=https%3A%2F%2Fecs-static.teamtreehouse.com%2Fassets%2Fcontent%2Fdefault_avatar-445fbbabfc8dc9188fb5967fe43322ee0c3e0dd1e10f378bf8343784af5a13eb.webp&r=pg)
Bjørn Jakobsen
Front End Web Development Techdegree Graduate 17,003 PointsMath.pow
// 4. Create a function that calculates the area of a circle. // The function should accept the radius of the circle as an argument // and return the area of that circle. // The area of a circle is the value of π * radius^2
My solution was
function areaCircle(radius) {
return Math.PI * radius * radius;
}
In the solution video Dave’s solution was
function areaCircle( radius ) {
return Math.PI * Math.pow(radius,2);
}
Both solutions works and I can’t figure out what Math.pow does why it’s better to use Dave’s solution. Is it just a way to calculate (radius * radius) without typing it twice or does it have any other advantages as well?
2 Answers
![Steven Parker](https://uploads.teamtreehouse.com/production/profile-photos/969492/micro_tool_chess_set_2.jpg)
Steven Parker
230,688 PointsAs used here, the function just raises "radius" to the power of 2, which is mathematically equivalent to multiplying it by itself. While Dave's solution implements the formula more literally, yours is perfectly acceptable and will produce the same results.
![Greg Radford](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/04eacf90a3a1e9fe8dcccb38c7c81662?s=96&d=https%3A%2F%2Fecs-static.teamtreehouse.com%2Fassets%2Fcontent%2Fdefault_avatar-445fbbabfc8dc9188fb5967fe43322ee0c3e0dd1e10f378bf8343784af5a13eb.webp&r=pg)
Greg Radford
7,127 PointsJust to add to this, the reason you would use the Math.pow function over writing radius * radius is purely to simplify the code and allow easy use of variables. It would be difficult to manage:
radius * radius * radius * radius * radius * radius
vs
vs Math.pow(radius,6)
In this demo, the power is either 2 for the circle, or 3 for the sphere, so you could create a power variable, for example.
![Steven Parker](https://uploads.teamtreehouse.com/production/profile-photos/969492/micro_tool_chess_set_2.jpg)
Steven Parker
230,688 PointsSince this function calculates an area, a power greater than 2 would never be required.
The sphere calculation requiring a power of 3 you are referring to is for volume, not area.