Welcome to the Treehouse Community

Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.

Looking to learn something new?

Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.

Start your free trial

Android Build an Interactive Story App (Retired) Intents and Multiple Activities Using String Resources

Bob Boursaw
Bob Boursaw
2,047 Points

missing something with getString when working string resource

I am totally missing something here. Even thought I don't feel like this is what we just went over, I am sure it is. I am not sure what it is I am missing or how I am supposed to proceed with this one. I spent some time looking at the documentation for the string resources but that has not seemed to help.

Any direction would be greatly appreciated.

CodeChallenge.java
Button loadPuppiesButton = (Button) findViewById(R.id.puppiesButton);
String buttonLabel = getString(1, R.string.name);
loadPuppiesButton.setText("morePuppies");
strings.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<resources>
  <string name="morePuppies">See More Puppies</string>
</resources>

1 Answer

Bob Boursaw
Bob Boursaw
2,047 Points

Unless I am missing something, the question is this challenge is very misleading.

It asks... "Now switch back to CodeChallenge.java. Set the buttonLabel variable to the new String resource you just added using the getString(int id) method. Don't forget: the id parameter will begin with R.string."

Resources... getString does not take a parameter of int, only string and Id, that I can tell from look at the docs.

The successfully answer this challenge, I only suplied one parameter, which was the id in the R.string. form.

Is this a typo or am I missing something?