Welcome to the Treehouse Community

Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.

Looking to learn something new?

Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.

Start your free trial

JavaScript JavaScript Loops, Arrays and Objects Simplify Repetitive Tasks with Loops The Refactor Challenge, Part 2

Nicole Blom
Nicole Blom
1,882 Points
Posted by Nicole Blom
Nicole Blom
1,882 Points

Solution without randomColor function using template literal, is this okay to do? (See my solution)

let html = '';

function getRandomByte() {
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * 256 );
}

for ( let i = 0; i <= 10; i += 1 ) {
  html += `<div style="background-color:rgb(${getRandomByte()},${getRandomByte()},${getRandomByte()})"></div>`;
}

document.write(html);

2 Answers

Steven Parker
Steven Parker
231,268 Points
Steven Parker
Steven Parker
231,268 Points

There's rarely only one way to reach a solution, and this will certainly do the same job. :+1:

Another approach (that might be easier to read) would be to keep the randomColor function, but incorporate a template literal in it also.

Fran ADP
Fran ADP
6,304 Points
Fran ADP
Fran ADP
6,304 Points

keep the random Color text, butintroduce a template literal in it.

Nicole Blom
Nicole Blom
1,882 Points
Nicole Blom
Nicole Blom
1,882 Points

Why is keeping the randomColor function necessary when you can shorten the code without it?