Welcome to the Treehouse Community
Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.
Looking to learn something new?
Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.
Start your free trialmax cyril
11,713 PointsThis teacher cannot teach i'm sorry
I'm satisfied with all treehouse teachers except for this one, I don't like his style of teaching, am I the only one who doesn't
max cyril
11,713 PointsHey Byron, I don't know why out of all teachers I just can't learn with him hahahaha, I don't mean any disrespect but to me he just doesn't teach well I don't know how to explain that further.
15 Answers
Kevin Faust
15,353 Pointsi dislike courses like this alot where its just copy and paste. he needs to give more explanations and we need challenges in the end.
max cyril
11,713 PointsLOL, hey Kevin, Youtube jQuery tutorials they help alot
Kevin Faust
15,353 Pointslol i quit jquery and javascript over a month ago
Kevin Faust
15,353 PointsWelp im back to jquery. wish me luck
Tom S
11,912 Points[Deleted]
William Ruiz
10,027 PointsHey Sameer, I totally know what you mean. I like Andrew, but Dave has that je ne sais quoi you aptly described. To be fair, I fell in love with jQuery in the FreeCodeCamp tutorials so I'm full steam ahead no matter. I found I get Andrew's lessons a lot better if, before hitting play on the video lesson, I review his teacher notes and documentation links. Personally I enjoy reading documentation as thought exercises so this works for me, but I know not everyone is a fan of docs.
Michalis Efstathiou
Courses Plus Student 4,638 Pointsi am the opposite, i find it very easy to learn with Andrew Chalkley
Monica Broadhead
7,740 PointsThat's how I feel. I feel like he is showing us the tools and processes needed to use jQuery. I've really enjoyed his teaching.
Danny Arvizu
11,447 PointsI agree with you Max. I mean no disrespect to the teacher but compared to the rest of the teachers here, his teaching approach is mediocre. In my opinion, he makes a lot of mistakes with his terminology. For example, he sometimes says 'remove' when he should say 'hide'. He corrects himself in the videos, I will give him that but it just makes the learning process all the more difficult. There are a bit more things I find problematic in his teaching methods, but my point was to simply show that I agree with you Max.
max cyril
11,713 PointsHey Danny, I youtubed jQuery and boughth a book, I'm pretty well now in it, you should youtube it too, 1000s of free videos lol, good luck
Devinder Sodhi
5,493 PointsThe major criticism I have for Andrew is that his challenges are ridiculously easy. Yes they test the concept, but if i don't struggle i don't remember. He even specifies the LINE where we need to make the change in the code. That should probably be a hint.
Other than that one nitpick, I love this course and the teacher really presents the material well.
Katarzyna Walsh
24,409 PointsI also really like Andrew and find his courses easy to follow (I'm an absolute jQuery beginner). I guess everybody learns differently, but I think Andrew's courses are excellent.
ub46473788
8,782 PointsI'm sorry to say that I agree with many of the remarks here. I don't like to disparage people making an effort to educate, as I myself am an educator. But constructive criticism is generally a good thing. In my opinion, Andrew's tendency not to explain what he's doing until after he's done it, and so, after the point at which I'm already confused, is one of the biggest problems I have. Additionally, Andrew tends not to use pronouns clearly. When talking about multiple objects, they'll all be referred to as "it" or "this", and after a few instances of each, you just lose track of what he's talking about (the problem is compounded by the use of the 'this' keyword. There are a handful of other problems I've got with Andrew's style, but those might be down to my own idiosyncrasies. He clearly knows what he's talking about, though -- obviously. But in a lot of ways, as some people have said, he doesn't explain things -- he just tells us what to write. It'd be like if I wanted to learn about cricket, and went to someone for help, and the person put on a cricket match. Then they say, "Here you go," rather than explaining the rules and concepts so that I can understand what I'm seeing. Eventually I'll get it, but it's not the most efficient way to transmit ideas.
ub46473788
8,782 PointsHaving progressed a bit further in the Front-End Web Dev track, and now working through the next series of Andrew's videos, I've got to say I think he gets a lot better. I'm not really having any problems following, and feeling like I'm learning and absorbing the material, in the "Interactive Web Pages with JavaScript" series.
I guess for those having trouble and getting frustrated, best advice is just to keep plowing ahead. Rewatch the videos (I did, several times, in fact). You'll get it eventually.
Edward Sapp
8,479 PointsNo disrespect to Andrew, but I also cannot follow his style. The reason I struggle with it is because during the "Plan" phase, he just goes out and writes the pseudo-code without explaining his underlying thought process. The real magic of the other teachers is they go one layer deeper, explaining why they're coding the high-level pseudo-code the way they are. Andrew just jumps straight into the pseudo-code and I have absolutely no idea what's going on because it's all happening without context or a frame of reference for the final product. Too abstract.
Purvi Agrawal
7,960 PointsI agree with the fact that he does not explain the concept of the project as why we are doing this, what can be another approach etc. The projects used are good but the way he explains it is not indepth. It feels like u r doing what he is asking u to do. No brainstorming.
Michael Matzner
12,651 Pointsbeing completely new to web development I find the teaching style difficult at times because the lack of explanation of the overall process + my lack of knowledge of jquery. The one thing that helped me was creating a site and trying to implement some of things he teaches in this course like the lightbox. Doesn't mean I have completely grasped the concept yet and I didn't expect to. I think the information you learn in this track takes a while to settle in especially if you are new like me. In learning you want everything to make sense immediately and then use the information you just acquired. I find that with this subject matter it takes a while to fully understand. Hang in there. I'm still trying to make sense of everything!
max cyril
11,713 PointsHey Michael I am hanging in there lol....I mean i didn't quit, I bought a book and youtube it.. they help alot
Rachelle Wood
15,362 PointsAn update: I took a couple more classes with this teacher and I am starting to agree with Max. This teacher is alright when he follows a specific procedure/outline, but in classes that require more explanation, I feel lost and like I didn't really learn much.
max cyril
11,713 PointsLOL...Hi Rachelle, yes I took a jQuery course with him, I was very lost, I think the way he approaches you,its as if you were an intermediate not a beginner, I think that's the problem
Rachelle Wood
15,362 PointsI was alright with the classes he taught using the four P's but I took the object-oriented JavaScript course and felt lost. The workshop on this subject is better. That instructor's teaching is clearer about how you organize your objects and how you program them. I also fell back on Java for understanding object-oriented languages though of course you don't have prototyping in Java.
The other jQuery courses I took on Treehouse were really clear: the one on how to use jQuery for AJAX requests and the one on using jQuery plugins. I thought they were very well-explained and well-organized. Did you take those?
I will definitely use your recommendations and youtube the jQuery stuff.
max cyril
11,713 PointsI did take them , but after I read my jQuery book, then everything flowed very well. I'm not a master of jQuery but I do more than well with it now.
Rachelle Wood
15,362 PointsYet another update: I am taking another one of his classes and so far so good. It is the one on database basics. He is clear with this one as well. I guess the only one I found hard to understand of his was the one on object-oriented JS, which is annoying because to me that is perhaps the most important course outside of the basic JS ones. Oh well...
Muhammad Imran
4,071 PointsI really like Andrew method. He always refer to documentation. His method really helpful for people who don't speak english like me. He makes me comfortable with documentation. He always make pseudo-code for the process of thinking.
Rachelle Wood
15,362 PointsThis teacher's teaching method is a big change from the others but I do like that he shows the process of how to think through a problem, find a solution, and implement the solution. My worry is getting the order of implementation wrong but then I guess the idea is to set up your own projects, practice, make booboos, and solve them. That is the best way to learn overall.
jimbojones
7,524 PointsI like Andrew's teaching style, also jQuery probably isn't an easy thing to explain to complete beginners.
Supratim Nandi
3,287 PointsI jz love the way Dave teaches us!I mean he just fills us with concept & everything we need to know about when,how,why.But I find andrews style bit of mugged up approach!I want to know the reason,I wanna know y? along with how!
Byron Stine
4,877 PointsByron Stine
4,877 PointsIs there a particular aspect of his style you are referring to? I found his approach to problems helpful. He did go over some pretty complex code that will seem useful in the future. I'd be happy to help if you need any.