Welcome to the Treehouse Community
Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.
Looking to learn something new?
Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.Start your free trial
Which is a better way to learn new material?
My question is pointed towards people with more experience in learning and applying web design who can help shine some light and provide their perspective.
Which approach to learning do you find to be more beneficial:
slowly learning one aspect of CSS (or HTML or anything really) and putting it into practice until you "get it" and then moving on, or
covering a slightly larger range of material more quickly and then afterwards creating a project that incorporates more things going on in the coding?
The second approach would probably involve a bit more review of the material after the initial learning than the first approach.
Your opinions would be much appreciated! Thanks!!
J T19,878 Points
In my opinion, learning a larger range of material will get you going a lot more efficiently than slowly learning a single aspect. A larger range will make it harder to remember things, but you can always go back to Treehouse for reference until you completely understand it.
Zen Hess6,700 Points
This will always come down to the person. You have to evaluate the way you learn best, and apply it to what you are learning at the time. I get bored easily if I am not creating something, so a project based learning environment is great for me. Others are fantastic with definitions and theory, and don't need to be using the stuff to understand it; that is a fine way of doing things as well. Of course, some people need and do both -- the dichotomy I created is a gradient of sorts. Dynamic learning comes from exposure, explanation and experimentation.
Teaching is always a challenge because of these broad spectrum; it's why so many children fall through the cracks of my towns school system. It gauges intelligence through tests. Some kids aren't great test takers, and fail and feel inferior. They perhaps would excel in an art class, or a mechanics class or something else, because they learn and succeed in different ways.