Welcome to the Treehouse Community
Want to collaborate on code errors? Have bugs you need feedback on? Looking for an extra set of eyes on your latest project? Get support with fellow developers, designers, and programmers of all backgrounds and skill levels here with the Treehouse Community! While you're at it, check out some resources Treehouse students have shared here.
Looking to learn something new?
Treehouse offers a seven day free trial for new students. Get access to thousands of hours of content and join thousands of Treehouse students and alumni in the community today.
Start your free trialAlex Herrera
Courses Plus Student 6,392 PointsWhy would you not ALWAYS use this selector?
It seems that the querySelector selectors are able to to do what everything the getElement(s) selectors are able to do.
Why would you not just use querySelector all the time...?
4 Answers
Steven Parker
231,269 PointsWhy carry only one tool when your toolbox can hold several?
Sure, querySelector is the "swiss army knife" of selection methods, but in some situations the other methods might be more efficient and/or more clearly convey the program intention to someone reading and maintaining the code.
ian izaguirre
3,220 PointsA few more reasons for why you would not always use querySelector:
1) Project Support. getElementById is supported by more older browsers. So if you are working with older code that needs wider browser support, then you would use that. An example, getElementById works with IE5.5 but querySelector is supported starting with IE8.
2) Performance. An example, getElementByClassName and getElementByTagName works faster than querySelectorAll.
3) getElementById is more specific in certain situations then querySelector, since querySelector ONLY returns the FIRST matching element.
Steven Parker
231,269 PointsI'm not sure 2 is true for all browsers. I think some use internal optimizations so the performance is about the same.
And regarding 3, getElementById ONLY returns one element (if any) in all situations, so in that aspect it is exactly the same as when using querySelector on ID's. Element ID's are required to be unique.
ian izaguirre
3,220 Points@Steven Parker
Your right :)
Michael Brown
12,406 PointsWhich is most commonly used or best practice? I'm more familiar with "getElement(s)" by way of Android development, but it seems like querySelector is a beefier option.
Steven Parker
231,269 PointsI'm not sure that choice of method would fall into the realm of "best practice" as long as the intent was clear. Personally, I would use querySelector anytime a combined selector is needed (rather than chaining the other methods), but if I just wanted an element that has an ID, I'd use getElementById.
kirkls
7,955 PointsI know this discussion is old, but it didn't seem necessary to start a new one.
As I go through these lessons it appears to me, more and more, that sometimes JavaScript is unnecessarily convoluted. The subject of this discussion for example. If querySelector and querySelectorAll will do the job, why are the other selector methods even available?
Maybe I'm just feeling cynical, but it seems unnecessary.
Ben Flores
17,074 PointsBen Flores
17,074 PointsAgreed. I think it's just easier/better readability.